logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015. 08. 26. 선고 2014누62328 판결
원고의 이 사건 건물의 취득가액을 실지 취득가액으로 볼 수 있는지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court-2013-Gu Group-12952 ( August 20, 2014)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 2013west0927

Title

Whether the Plaintiff’s acquisition value of the building of this case can be viewed as the actual acquisition value

Summary

원고가 이 사건 건물의 매매대금으로 0000원을 김ㅇㅇ에게 지급하였다고 인정하기에 부족하고, 달리 이를 인증할 증거가 없다

Cases

2014Nu62328 Disposition of revocation of capital gains tax imposition

Plaintiff and appellant

AA

Defendant, Appellant

ㅇㅇ세무서장

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2013Gudan12952 decided August 20, 2014

Conclusion of Pleadings

July 15, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

August 26, 2015

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The transfer income tax reverted to the Plaintiff on October 1, 2012, which the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on October 1, 2012

The imposition of KRW 000 (including additional duties) shall be revoked.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as that for the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it can be cited by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow