logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.02.24 2015고단6142
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
Text

[Defendant A] Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months

However, with respect to Defendant A, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 27, 2015, Defendant A driven a Dgro vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license from the lease coffee, which was located in the sphere of 667 in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the right line of which was located in the 667 line, to the day before the end of the Dong-gu, the modern subordinate Ham-dong, which was located in the same city, from around 1km to the front of the ELtel.

2. Defendant B was aware of the fact that Defendant B driven a car without obtaining a driver’s license due to a friendly appearance of the Defendant as described in paragraph (1).

Nevertheless, at around 02:54 on September 27, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement as if the Defendant driven the said car, to the traffic of the Suwon-gu Police Station in the Suwon-dong, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, and to the assistant E belonging to the above police station who is investigating the said case at the traffic survey department office.

As a result, the defendant had a person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Defendant A who has the relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 152 Subparag. 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (Selection of Imprisonment): Defendant B: Article 151(1) of the Criminal Act (the recognition of the crime, the fact that it is against the recognition of the crime, the fact that property benefits are not visible from the crime of this case, and the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment other than the twice fine, etc.);

1. Defendant B who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who is under the suspension of execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (it may be considered, such as the fact that the criminal defendant recognizes and reflects the crime, that the criminal defendant voluntarily surrenders to the investigative agency, and that the criminal defendant does not have any excessive criminal record);

1. Defendant A: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow