logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.10.13 2016고단2688
자동차관리법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 2688"

1. Any person who violates the Automobile Management Act shall apply for the registration of transfer within 15 days from the date of purchase;

Nevertheless, on January 2016, the Defendant received from a male on his name in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, for the transfer registration within 15 days, the Defendant did not apply for the transfer registration of the CTS car within the 3,000,000 won from a male on his name.

2. On April 18, 2016, the Defendant was driving the automobile of Paragraph 1 without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 4 km from 9 km to 594 km in the mountain of Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City due to the revision of the 00:30 on April 18, 2016.

3. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, on April 18, 2016, the Defendant operated a passenger car set forth in paragraph 1, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, in the section set forth in paragraph 2, around 00:30.

around 16:50 on July 25, 2016, the Defendant driven a Cubur car not covered by mandatory insurance without obtaining a driver’s license from around 10km to the 10km road from the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, to the 1666-5 side of the Sinnam-gu, Sungnam-si.

"2016 Highest 4131"

1. On April 6, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Non-licenseless Driving) driving a Cubur CTS car in the section of about 10km from the front of Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu to the change of about 154km from the front of 29-32, the 54-gil to the change of the Sinnam-si, Sungnam-si, as Seocho-gu, Seoul.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act operated a car with a gresses as stated in paragraph 1, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the date and place specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 2688"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Registers of automobile registration, and registers of driver's licenses;

1. Inquiry into the mandatory insurance policy;

arrow