logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2017.09.07 2017고단756
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of two and a half years, for a period of one year, and for a period of six months, for each of the defendants C.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, in the event of a traffic accident while driving a high-priced motor vehicle, an insurance company is likely to take a long-term repair time and increase the amount of compensation, such as excessive occurrence of replacement vehicle sirens, with the consent of the owner of the motor vehicle, and is aware that there is a case where compensation procedures are simplely handled by paying the unpaid automobile repair costs (hereinafter “unrepair costs”) and the large amount of compensation with the consent of the owner of the motor vehicle. By abusing such compensation procedures, A intentionally caused the accident by abusing the compensation procedures, and intended to have the insurance money acquired by means of claiming the unrepair costs while claiming the unrepair costs, as if the traffic accident occurred due to negligence

1. The Defendants’ joint crime committed by Defendant B with a heavy and high-speed with the intent to dispose of the said insurance fraud car in the name of Defendant C with the knowledge that Defendant A would benefit from the so-called “insurance fraud” as above, and conspired to commit an accident by providing the said car to Defendant A as an accident vehicle, thereby obtaining insurance proceeds.

Defendant

C On December 14, 2015, around 01:35, 01:00, at the intersection at the bottom of the Dondo, located at the bottom of the Busan YY-gu, Busan, the defendant received a false traffic accident insurance policy with the purport that, by calls to employees in the name and influence of the victims of the damage to modern commercial accident, the victims of the damage to the commercialization and reinsurance Co., Ltd., "Influences the JW-man first car in violation of the notification that he would drive the IW-man car," and the defendant A is the driver of the first passenger car in the above new car, and his female job-friendly K is the driver of the above new car, and the victim's employee was injured by the traffic accident caused by the defendant C.

A false statement was made.

However, the facts are as follows: Defendant C is driving the above sofaging car according to Defendant A’s instruction and parked at the lower intersection of the above sofaging bridge; Defendant A is a person who gets off the above new car and intentionally drive the front car.

arrow