logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.08.26 2015고단3513
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery of an official document;

A. On May 27, 2011, the Defendant: (a) at the office E, a corporation where the Defendant, located in Busan Seo-gu, as the business head, worked for the head of the business department; (b) was anticipated to have a failure in the supply due to the lack of the test report issued by the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration of Busan Ulsan-do on the type, etc. among the ship parts to be supplied to the Navy Guns headquarters; and (c) was able to write a new test report using the test report

On November 15, 2007, the Defendant: (a) drafted a survey report (numberf) on a waterproof spring, etc. (N/FL200WV) and a waterproofbluor (N/RT-2W3S) prepared in the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration of Busan, Ulsan District, which was issued on November 15, 2007; (b) drafted a report on a waterproof spring, etc. (N/F) and a waterproofbluor (N/RT-2W3S) in the sample name of the sample name of the test report (N/WT-2W3S) and reproduced it again.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged one copy of the test report issued by public office in the name of the Administrator of Busan Metropolitan Government Small and Medium Business Administration.

B. On January 28, 2008, the Defendant, who was issued on January 28, 2008, forged one copy of the test report under the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration of Busan Ulsan District, which is a document issued by public offices, by changing the test report (N/FL20WV) of waterproof-type light (N/FL20WV) to a new method.

2. On the same day as Paragraph 1, the Defendant held that the Defendant’s employee was a document duly formed with the tallyman affiliated with the Chief of the Small and Medium Business Administration in the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration of Busan Ulsan District Office, who is aware of the forgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

arrow