1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation regarding the instant case was that “Around October 7, 2010” in Section 2, Section 10 of the first instance court’s judgment, and that “Abstinence surgery, scinary surgery, and scinary surgery,” in Section 12 of the said Section 12 of the said judgment.

“Abstinence was also received from the Franchisium on October 7, 2010,” 3, 5, 3, 5, 5, 5, and 5, 5, and 1,30 or 33, as evidence of lack or rejection of the Plaintiff’s assertion, as evidence of lack or rejection of the Plaintiff’s assertion, the fact inquiry into the president of the Seoul University Dental Hospital of the Seoul University by the court of the first instance on the basis of the part of the judgment of the first instance except for addition of the description of each questioning letter submitted by I to the professional examiner of the court of the first instance. As such, this is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance that dismissed the plaintiff's claim of this case is justifiable. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.