1. The part of the claim regarding KRW 9,69,250 expanded in the instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims.

1. The Plaintiff’s lawfulness of the part of the claim extended among the instant lawsuits filed a claim for payment of KRW 30,00,000 as damages against the Defendant at the instant complaint, and the claim was extended to KRW 39,69,250 on April 13, 2017 and on May 23, 2017, but the claim was extended to KRW 39,69,250 on the part of the expanded claim (= KRW 39,699,250,250), which is the part of the claim (= KRW 39,699,250-30,000), did not revise the Plaintiff’s stamp even in the order of correction ordered on the date of pleading on May 23, 2017. The part of the claim extended among the instant lawsuit was unlawful.

(A) As to the claim in this case, the plaintiff's assertion on this part is not accepted, since it is not acknowledged that the defendant's tort was committed as set forth in the following 2.

A. In addition to the Plaintiff’s assertion, the Democratic Party inspected the Plaintiff’s personal information and privacy by cellphoneing for 7 years, and exceeded the content thereof to the Defendant, and used data by illegal copying of the number identical to the Plaintiff’s mobile phone.

Therefore, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff is obliged to pay 30,000,000 won to the plaintiff due to the amount of unjust enrichment for the past one year and six months, and the amount of damages for the following 30 years.

B. The evidence of the Plaintiff’s submission alone is insufficient to recognize the fact that the Defendant illegally provided the Plaintiff’s personal information, etc. from a democratic party, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim based on the premise is groundless

3. In conclusion, the part of the Plaintiff’s claim as to KRW 9,69,250 expanded among the instant lawsuits is dismissed, and the remainder of the Plaintiff’s claim is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.