beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed.
2. A claim extended in the trial of the instant case.
Reasons
1. The following facts in the process of the instant lawsuit are apparent in the records or significant in this court.
On January 13, 2012, the Plaintiff submitted to the Plaintiff money of KRW 40,00,000 for Defendant Daegu Metropolitan City G, KRW 30,000 for Defendant Daegu Metropolitan City H, KRW 30,000 for Defendant Daegu Metropolitan City H, KRW 70,00,000 for corrective reports, apologys, and KRW 20,000 for Defendant C, KRW 30,000 for Daegu Metropolitan City JJ, KRW 30,000 for police officers of North Busan Metropolitan City, KRW 10,000 for Defendant Daegu Metropolitan City, KRW 10,000 for police officers of North Busan Metropolitan City, KRW 20,00 for each of the following reasons, KRW 20,00 for Defendant D with KRW 20,00 for Defendant D with KRW 10,00 for each of the following reasons, KRW 00 for Defendant D with KRW 100,00 for each of the above reasons, KRW 00 for Defendant D with each of the above reasons.
1) Defendant Republic of Korea (Seoul Northern Police Station) disclosed the Plaintiff’s personal information and privacy to Defendant B, and Defendant Republic of Korea (Seoul Western Fire Station) provided and divulged all of the Plaintiff’s non-disclosure civil petitions to Defendant B. (2) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) received false interview from Pauri’s management director D, Women’s president K, resident N, and F (Co-Defendant in the first instance trial) and published them on March 30, 201. Defendant B published on March 30, 201. The Plaintiff filed a written reply to the Press Arbitration Commission by illegally acquiring confidential civil petitions from the Daegu Western Fire-Fighting Station and the Daegu Northern Fire-Fighting Station that had no relation to the Plaintiff’s claim for damages to the Press Arbitration Commission.
3) Defendant C’s reporters, as the reporters belonging to Defendant B, interviewed false facts and submitted and reported them to Defendant B. 4) Defendant Daegu North-gu Office provided the Plaintiff’s non-disclosure civil petition to Defendant B.
5) E (the co-defendants of the first instance trial belong to the Daegu Northern Police Station.