1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's claim extended by this court is dismissed.

3...

1. According to the legitimacy of a claim expanded in the first instance trial and the records of a claim expanded in the trial, on June 9, 2017, the Plaintiff is determined as KRW 43,600 [39,69,250 won x 45/10,000 + 5,000 won + (30,000 won x 45/10,000 + 5,000 won + 5,000 won] of the revenue stamp amount of KRW 14,317,480, which was the part of the claim expanded in the first instance trial on April 17, 2018 + 96,600 [30,00 won] of the revenue stamp amount of KRW 96,60 [30,05,050 x 105,050] of the Plaintiff’s revenue stamp amount of KRW 14,317,480 x 405] of the first instance trial.

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The plaintiff's assertion and democratic party sought to make the plaintiff as an election campaign worker, but did not mean that they were campaigned, and as a retaliation against the plaintiff and his family members, they exceeded information on the plaintiff's personal information and privacy, and inspected the plaintiff for not less than eight years.

In addition, the democratic party has continuously hacking the defendant's mobile phone, and it is anticipated that hacking will continue for the next 30 years.

In addition, the defendant received information on the plaintiff's personal information and privacy from a democratic party, and used a cell phone illegally reproduced with a democratic party to impose the plaintiff's communication fee unfairly, and infringed the plaintiff's privacy.

Therefore, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the sum of KRW 54,016,730,00,000 to the Plaintiff as compensation for losses or losses sustained or sustained by the Plaintiff and the disabled Plaintiff’s children due to the above tort.

B. The evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone that the Defendant imposed communications charges on the Plaintiff without any legal ground.

It is not sufficient to acknowledge that a tort was committed as alleged by the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

The plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim of this case is concluded.