(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.10.16 2013고단3177

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.10.16 2013고단3177

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From around 23:00 on July 5, 2013, the Defendant driven B rocketing car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.238% without a vehicle driver’s license at approximately 600 meters from the road near the Namdong-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do to the front road of the same new stop.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the violation of the Road Traffic Act are those who are engaged in the operation of B rocketing and other automobiles;

At around 23:00 on July 5, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, and driven the two-lane road in front of the new stop speed in the south-gu New Market in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do along the direction of the shooting distance in the new market at a speed of about 60km per hour from the direction of the new market.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering system, brakes, etc. of the motor vehicle and to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the front left and right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so before the discharge.

The part behind the driver's car of the victim who stops on the front side of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the driver's vehicle was inferred into the front part of the driver's vehicle.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C, such as catitiss and tensions, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and suffered injury to the victim E, who is the passenger, such as brain, requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant destroyed the said tra car to KRW 1,617,406, such as the cost of repairing the driver.

3. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not subscribe to automobile mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the foregoing 2.2.

참조조문

-교통사고처리 특례법

-도로교통법

-자동차손해배상 보장법

유사 판례

-울산지방법원 2014.12.12 2014고단2947

-울산지방법원 2014.10.02 2014고단2478

-울산지방법원 2020.02.06 2019고단3871

-울산지방법원 2015.08.13 2015고단1132

-울산지방법원 2015.06.04 2015고단602