A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 30, 2007, the Defendant committed a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Ulsan District Court on the same day (hereinafter referred to as Ulsan District Court) by committing a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at least 1 million won, a fine of 4 million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the same court on June 29, 2007, and on August 12, 2010, the same court issued a summary order of 2 million won as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at least twice, respectively.

Nevertheless, at around 01:50 on July 13, 2014, the Defendant driven approximately 300 meters of B car from the front of the clothes of Korea, under the influence of alcohol of 0.132%, in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-dong, to the front of the consul distance in the same month and the front road of the same month.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is engaged in driving the B car.

The Defendant driven the said car at the time and place under paragraph (1) and proceeded six lanes in front of the consul distance located in the Southern-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, to the direction of the camping-do from the side of the Ulsan-gu Art Center.

In addition, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, has the duty of care to check whether there is a vehicle passing through the intersection by reducing speed in entering the intersection of the front bank and checking well the front side of the road, and to prevent the accident in advance by driving the motor vehicle safely according to the traffic signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and driven by the victim C (the aged 51) who was proceeding to the left-hand turn from the left-hand side of the running direction by the negligence in violation of the vehicle stop signal as it is, and led the victim D (the age of 48) to the front-hand part of the Estyna taxi where the victim D (the age of 48) was on the customer.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on the part of the above occupational negligence in order to keep the victim C in a right-hand high-speed area, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.