logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2014.01.16 2013고단656
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the owner of A truck, and around 15:23 June 21, 2003, the employees of B were the roads that limit the load load of 2.5 meters on the national highways 23-on the 23th national highways at the Cheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Cheongnam-si, by operating the steel rail angle of 3.1 meters wide by operating more than 0.6 meters wide at the same vehicle. The Defendant violated the restriction on operation and refused without justifiable grounds to request the submission of relevant documents by the Department C belonging to the Construction Office for the Ministry of Construction and Transportation, the Ministry of Construction and Transportation, the Ministry of Construction and Transportation, and the Ministry of Control.

2. The Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga38 dated October 28, 2011 rendered on the 2010Hun-Ga38 dated October 28, 201 that the applicable provisions of this case are retroactively null and void (former part of Article 325

arrow