logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2013.05.16 2013고단64
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On August 24, 2001, the summary of the facts charged (2013dan64) the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, committed a violation of the restriction on operation by loading more than 3.91 tons, 14.57 tons of total weight, 13.91 tons on the 2 axis, 3 stable, 14.57 tons, loaded more than 3.91 tons, 3.91 tons, and 4.57 tons on each of the 2 axis, at an inspection station on the 597 line of Young-gun-gun, Youngcheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-do, a local highway 597, in order to preserve the structure of the road as C driver and prevent danger to traffic.

(2013No. 65) On June 19, 2006, the Defendant violated the restriction on operation by loading more than 2.08 tons, 11.52 tons on the 2 axis, 2.08 tons, and 11.52 tons of each of the vehicles loaded more than 2.08 tons on the 3 axis, 2.08 tons, and 1.52 tons in order to preserve the road structure and prevent traffic danger at an inspection station on the 597 Line of Young-gun-gun, Young-gun, Seocheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the local highway 597, the local highway 597.

(2013No. 66) On August 16, 2002, the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, loaded the said dump truck with 14.5 tons, 13.12 tons on the 2 axis of the 14.55 tons of the 3 dump truck, 13.5 tons of each of the dump trucks, with an excessive loading capacity of 3.12 tons on the roads prior to the inspection of the restriction on operation of the 88 line of Young-gun, Young-gun, Gangwon-do State-funded State-funded Local Highway, Seocheon-do, Gangwon-do.

(1) On September 6, 2006, the Defendant: (a) at the examination room for the control of vehicles in violation of the restriction on operation in Samyang-gun, Samyang-gun, Samyang-gun on September 6, 2006, the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, as E, restricted the excess operation of 10 tons, gross weight of 40 tons, height of 4.20 meters, length of 16.7m, width of 2.5m or 14.25m or more of the said vehicle to E driver in order to preserve the structure and prevent any danger of operation; (b) however, even though D, as its employees, operated the cargo equivalent to 14.80 tons or 14.25 tons of the 2 axis of the said vehicle and loaded it with freight of 14.80 tons or more of the 3 stable of the said vehicle, exceeding 4.3m or 4.25 tons of the 3mn of the said vehicle.

arrow