1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 19, 1950, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on August 10, 1955, and was discharged from military service on August 14, 1955. On March 14, 1953, 1953, the Plaintiff recognized that “the parts of the parts of the parts of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the facilities of the

B. On the other hand, on June 15, 2016, the Plaintiff applied for a re-examination on the grounds of aggravation of the wounds and applied for a re-examination, and on July 21, 2016, there was an opinion that “the self-determination of the person in charge of the physical examination of the Daejeon Veterans Hospital” constituted class 5 to class 81111 of the disability rating, but the Board of Patriots and Veterans decided on October 27, 2016 as the disability rating 6-2 and 8121.

Accordingly, on November 4, 2016, the Defendant rendered a physical examination determination disposition on the classification of the disability ratings with the purport that the “satisfe-satfe-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-s

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. Although the Plaintiff’s assertion that “Saewnwnwnws of creative part” (hereinafter “the instant wound”) falls under class 5-8111 of the disability rating, the instant disposition recognized as a disability rating 6-6-2(2) and 8121 ought to be revoked in an unlawful manner.

(b) The details of the relevant statutes are as shown in the attached statutes.

C. 1) Determination 1) Article 6-4 of the Act on Persons of Distinguished Services to the State, Article 14(2) and (3) [Attachment 3] of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and Article 8-3 [Attachment 4] of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act, with respect to any disability of legs and fallings, the contents of disability are always assistive devices such as the neutism of the diplomatic mission, even though they had undergone repathic pathic s