logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.09.10 2014나11043
상품판매대금반환
Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and all other parts of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the dismissal or addition of part of the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

[Supplementary or additional parts] In the second part, “the first instance court” shall be added in front of “the witness” in the second part 10.

Part 3, "If completed, according to the results of the law after the completion of the settlement of accounts" in Part 10 shall be read as "after completion".

Part 4, "the first instance court" shall be added in front of "the witness" in Part 8.

Part 4, "No. 6" in Part 14 shall be raised with "No. 7."

Part 5, “goods” shall be added in front of the “loss” in Part 8.

Part 5, Part 13 "H" is raised as "D".

In the 6th page 10, the “former” in the 6th page 10 shall be dismissed as “immediately.”

Part 6, "the intermediate manager" in Part 13 shall be changed to "the intermediate manager".

In Part 6, "No. 17" was added to "The defendant confirmed and signed electronic inventory and the inspection inventory at the time of termination of the third contract of this case".

Part 6, "the inventory quantity" in Part 18 is "812 of the actual inventory," and one "B" is different.

The head of the 7th page "the head of the headquarters" shall be raised as "the duplicate of the complaint of this case".

The "C" shall be added in the front of the "repaid" of the 7th page.

Part 7, "claim 15" shall be changed to "claim".

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of the principal lawsuit is justified, and the defendant's claim of the counterclaim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow