logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.04.27 2015고정1089
자격모용사문서작성등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From September 1, 2014, the Defendant served as the chairman of the representative meeting of the occupants of apartment houses in Jeju City from around September 1, 2014, and was dismissed from office as the chairman and the representative of the Dong through the resident voting around May 26, 2015.

1. Notwithstanding that the Defendant, as above, was notified of dismissal according to the result of the residents' voting as the Chairperson's voting in the position of acting as the Chairperson, and was not done on behalf of the Chairperson, on June 2, 2015, the Defendant prepared a draft document from the Defendant's house located at around 10:0,00, the Defendant prepared the document in the name of the document originator in the name of the document originator, "C Resident's Representative Meeting", "the 11 representative meeting of the occupants," and "the convening of the resident representative meeting (emergency)," and "a contract, related documents, etc. necessary for the activities of the resident representative meeting to D who has worked in the management office" and "2. The time when the resident representative meeting is convened to take responsibility for the disciplinary action, as follows.

“1) On the date and time column of the meeting: “The first floor center of the management office, the first floor of the management office, the disciplinary action against D personnel in charge of the management office,” and “the duties of the chairperson of the C Apartment resident representative meeting on behalf of the chairperson of the C Apartment resident representative meeting” were stamped in the column of the meeting place and agenda column, and the seal was affixed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant has forged a document in the name of the proxy director of the representative meeting of the above occupants, which is a private document on rights and obligations, for the purpose of gathering the representative qualification of the above occupants.

2. The Defendant, at around 14:00 on the same day, issued a forged C&L convening document to the 11st representative of the above apartment building who is aware of the forgery, as if the document was duly formed, or made a gap or mail in the entrance door in which each such representative resides.

arrow