A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Crimes against victims C;

A. A. Around May 2013, the Defendant made a false statement on May 2013, 2013 to the victim C that “on the face of making a profit to pay money at the horse site, there is no profit, and if the Defendant borrowed money, he/she will operate the money to pay 200,000 won per week.”

However, there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if the money was borrowed from the victim.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim, and is also against the victim.

5. Around 31.31. Around 31.30, 1000,000 won was remitted to the Defendant’s account in the name of small and medium enterprise.

B. Around June 13, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “Around June 13, 2013, the Defendant would take a vehicle as security, and to pay KRW 10,000,000 after one month, if he/she lends money to the victim by telephone at an unsound place.”

However, there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if the money was borrowed from the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 10,000,000 from the victim to the account in the name of small and medium enterprise in the name of the Defendant, and acquired it by fraud.

2. Crimes against victims D;

A. A. Around December 22, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would repay KRW 5,000,000 after one week by putting a phone to the victim D at an infinite place on December 22, 2011.

However, there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if the money was borrowed from the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 5,00,000 from the victim to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant, and acquired it by deception.

B. Around January 2012, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement that “Around January 2012, the Defendant would pay KRW 5,000,000,000, which was borrowed prior to the borrowing of money, to the victim’s phone at an unspecified place.”

However, the facts are.