A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud against the victim B;

A. A. Around September 14, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “Around September 2013, the Defendant would repay money within six months if he/she lent money to the victim B” at a place where he/she was first patrolmen.

However, in fact, the defendant was unable to pay money even if he borrowed money from the victim because he did not have any income as a bad credit holder at the time.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received money from the victim on September 14, 2013 as the borrowed money and acquired money from the victim.

B. Around February 28, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “Around February 28, 2014, the Defendant would have to operate a club at an influent place to the victim B, and that “A person would have repaid the club within six months, with a loan of KRW 10 million prior to the loan of KRW 10 million.”

However, in fact, the defendant was unable to pay money even if he borrowed money from the victim because he did not have any income as a bad credit holder at the time.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received money from the victim on February 28, 2014 for the purpose of borrowing money and acquired money from the victim.

2. Crimes against victims C;

A. From July 2015, the fraud Defendant did not have money to have the victim C receive convenience points in the Enobya club operated by the Defendant, Non-Acheon-si D.

When lending money, interest shall be paid at 20% per annum, and only six months shall be used and repaid.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, the Defendant did not have a plan to take over convenience points at the time and did not have a debt amounting to 20 million to 30 million to 30 million won as a person with bad credit standing, and there was no profit due to poor operation of the above singing shop, and thus, the Defendant did not have the ability to pay the debt even if he borrowed money from the victim.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such.