A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around October 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D within the investment office where it is impossible to know the name of the Defendant of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C 406 at the end of October 2008, that “if he/she lends money to operate a credit business, he/she shall give three additional interest every month, and the principal shall be repaid at any time if he/she requests a return of money before one month.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any balance of the passbook because he was not well in the business with bad credit standing at the time, and the Defendant did not have any specific property and did not have the ability to make a full payment even if he borrowed money from the victim solely on the part of non-performing loans which had not been recovered after the due date for payment.

As above, on November 15, 2008, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim from the victim, transferred KRW 10 million to the bank account in the name of the Defendant, and acquired KRW 15 million in total from November 21, 2008.

2. Around February 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D by telephone at a place where a police officer was not a policeman on early February 2009, stating, “If the Defendant borrowed money to pay 20 million won or more, he shall pay interest every month, and the principal shall be repaid at any time, if the Defendant wishes to return the money before one month.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any balance of the passbook because the Defendant was not well in a business with bad credit standing at the time, and did not have any particular property, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim solely on the part of non-performing loans which had not been recovered after the maturity date, the Defendant did not have the ability to repay it.

On February 26, 2009, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained KRW 8 million from the victim to the account known by the Defendant on February 26, 2009, KRW 7.20,000 from the Defendant’s bank account, and KRW 5.82,00 from the Defendant’s bank account on February 27, 2009, and acquired KRW 1,382,00 in total by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. The defendant;