Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Basic Facts] On January 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) operated C; (b) entered into a contract with the Establishment Promotion Committee for D Housing Reconstruction and Improvement Project (hereinafter “Promotion Committee”); and (c) entered into a maintenance project agreement; (d) on January 24, 2014; and (e) on January 2014 and the same year.

3. On March 31, 31, the instant promotion committee received personal information, including personal information, including “list of owners of land, etc.” and “list of persons without consent to housing” in the rearrangement zone where personal information is personal information, from the members of the promotion committee, who are data subjects.

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in any other Act, no person who has been provided with personal information from a personal information manager shall use the personal information for any purpose other than the intended purpose of provision thereof or provide it to a third party.

[Criminal facts]

1. On March 4, 2015, the Defendant sent a postal item to the members of the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Promotion Committee with personal information, such as the personal information, address, etc. of the members who were provided by the side of the Promotion Committee, and then used personal information for any purpose other than its original purpose by sending it to the members of the Promotion Committee, including F, a notice.

2. On March 17, 2015, the Defendant sent to the members of the Promotion Committee under 790 a postal item containing a “written notice” to the effect that the said item is to be carried out under the “written notice,” and used personal information for any purpose other than its original purpose.

[Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the act is not illegal due to acts that do not go against social norms. However, in light of the fact that there are no objective grounds for arbitrarily using operating funds, etc. in the enforcement department of the Promotion Committee of this case, the act of the judgment does not violate social norms.