logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.07.14 2016가단29755
임차보증금반환금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly pay KRW 70,000,000 to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3...

Reasons

Comprehensively taking account of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including additional numbers) and the overall purport of the pleadings, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement for the lease deposit of KRW 70,00,000 and the lease term of two years with respect to the 3 and 210 Dong-dong D Apartment-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on March 10, 2014, and the Plaintiff expressed his/her intention not to renew the lease agreement on January 10, 2016, and requested the return of the deposit upon the expiration of the lease term on March 10, 2016, but the Defendants failed to return the lease deposit.

Therefore, since a lease agreement entered into with the Defendants on March 10, 2014 terminated due to the expiration of the lease term, the Defendants jointly have a duty to return KRW 70,000,000 to the Plaintiff.

The claim of this case is justified.

arrow