logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.10.19 2016가단223535
보증금반환
Text

1. The Defendants jointly pay KRW 43,000,000 to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3...

Reasons

The following facts are established: (a) there is no dispute between the Defendants and the Defendants, and (b) the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the term from July 12, 2010 to July 12, 2012; (c) the actual deposit paid by the Plaintiff is equivalent to KRW 43,00,000; and (d) the Plaintiff intended to become a new lessee through the real estate brokerage office from January 2012, 201, but failed to seek renewal of the lease agreement, based on the following: (a) the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendants on February 10, 201: (a) the lease agreement with the term from July 12, 201 to July 12, 2012; and (b) the Plaintiff did not want renewal of the lease agreement.

Thus, the above lease contract is terminated upon the expiration of the term, so the defendants are jointly obligated to return the deposit amount of KRW 43,000,000 to the plaintiff.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow