1. The Defendants jointly pay to the Plaintiff KRW 30,200,000 and the interest rate thereon from April 12, 2018 to the date of full payment.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 30, 2010, the Plaintiff paid the Defendants KRW 650,00,000 as lease deposit, and leased the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Apartment E (hereinafter “instant apartment”) for two years.

The lease term has been extended by October 29, 2014.

B. From August 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendants agreed not to renew the contract on September 5, 2014 because they did not comply with the conditions while consulting on the renewal of the contract.

Therefore, the Plaintiff requested the Defendants to pay part of the above lease deposit in advance so that the new house rental contract can be paid to the Defendants, but the Defendants refused the said request.

C. On September 11, 2014, the Plaintiff notified the Defendants of the purport that “a new house’s down payment of KRW 70,000,000 was prepared and entered into a new house-related lease agreement, and on October 29, 2014, the instant apartment will be ordered, and thus, on October 29, 2014, the Plaintiff shall return the lease deposit and request the return thereof.”

On September 26, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with F and Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G Apartment H with a term of 700,000,000 lease deposit, payment date of remainder (670,000,000) and delivery date, and November 14, 2014 on the date of delivery, and from November 14, 2014 to November 13, 2016, and paid F performance deposit KRW 30,000,000.

The Plaintiff immediately notified Defendant B of the conclusion of the above lease agreement as a mobile phone text messages.

E. On October 3, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) determined the date of director as October 29, 2014 by the director company I, and received a package director check; and (b) paid 200,000 won of the down payment to the said company on October 9, 2014.

F. The Defendants requested the real estate brokerage office to mediate the lease of the instant apartment, and the real estate broker visited the instant apartment several times with the lessee, but the new lease contract on the instant apartment was not concluded.

(g) the defendant.