Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants, upon purchasing the livestock disaster insurance for horses, knew that the State would subsidize 50% of the premium if the policyholder is a person registered with the horse producers' association, and had the horses owned by the Defendants purchased the livestock disaster insurance as if they were owned by the Defendant B, with the intent to receive the premium from the State, as if they were owned by the Defendant B.

Defendant

A purchased and owned the horses “E” around June 2010, but Defendant B entered into a false sales contract as if Defendant B purchased the said horses with Defendant B, and Defendant B entered into a disaster insurance contract for the said horses at the head-Gun branch of the NH Loss Insurance Co., Ltd. located in the former Head-gun of North Korea on September 1, 2010, and prepared and submitted relevant documents, such as a false insurance subscription contract, as if Defendant B was the owner of the said horses, and then the said insurance company notified the Korea Coast Guard of the aforementioned false insurance contract, and around September 2010, the said insurance company required the said insurance company to pay KRW 2,348,00,000, the total insurance premium of the said horses amount of KRW 50% to the said insurance company.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim to pay the above insurance company premium of KRW 2,348,00 to the victim, thereby obtaining economic benefits equivalent to the above amount.

2. The Defendants were aware of the fact that the sales price for the horses shall be calculated as the insurable value at the time of purchasing the Korean Livestock Disaster Insurance for the victim NH damage Insurance Co., Ltd., with an awareness of the fact that the Defendants, at the time of purchasing the Korean Livestock Disaster Insurance for the horses, had the intent to claim excessive payment of the insurance money by preparing and submitting a sales contract stating

Defendant

A, even though he purchased the said horses from F around June 2010 to KRW 12,00,000, the F sold the said horses to Defendant A for the purpose of making up for the sales amount.