logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.04.06 2016나113441
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

Judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On August 12, 2013, around 24:00, the Plaintiff: (a) driven the E-vehicle in front of the D Unmanned in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon; and (b) was in the direction of Bosasan in the direction of Bosasan from the side of the Bosagle, the Plaintiff conflicts with the FF driver G of the first instance court, which was insured against Defendant Samsung Fire, in the direction of the e-ray from the surface of the e-ray to the e-ray.

(hereinafter “instant traffic accident.” The Plaintiff suffered from the Aggravated Dagsung (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”) due to the instant traffic accident.

원고는 2013. 8. 13. H병원에서 진료를 받고 같은 달 16. 비골절에 대한 수술(이하 ‘1차 수술’이라 한다)을 받았다. 그러나 위 수술 후에도 교통사고로 인한 비골골절로 비골이 주저앉고 삐뚤어지는 현상이 남게 되었다. 원고는 1차 수술 후에도 남게 된 위와 같은 증상을 치료하기 위하여 제1심 피고 학교법인 가톨릭학원이 운영하는 대전성모병원에 2013. 12. 5. 내원하여 의사인 피고로부터 2013. 12. 12. 비교정술 등(이하 ‘2차 수술’이라 한다)을 받은 이후 2014. 6. 19.까지 치료를 받았다.

Since then, the plaintiff complained of the change of the pain and the co-morry type of the co-morry type of the co-morry, was performed a re-operation to correct it at the Chungcheongnamnam University Hospital, but there remain symptoms of the non-satellite non-morry.

Meanwhile, on the other hand, the Plaintiff filed a false medical examination and treatment record from December 12, 2013 to June 19, 2014, and on June 19, 2014, filed a complaint with the Defendant on suspicion that the Plaintiff refused to provide medical treatment without justifiable grounds. However, on August 5, 2016, the Defendant was subject to the Daejeon District Prosecutors’ Office’ Office’ Office’s disposition having no suspicion (Evidence of Evidence).

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 4 through Gap evidence 7, Eul evidence 9, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2, Eul evidence 4 (which include each number number), the fact inquiry results for the director of Chungcheongnamnam University Hospital in the first instance, and the first instance court.

arrow