1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On May 19, 2009, the fact that the Plaintiff received 4 cosmetic cosmetic surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”) from the Defendant, i.e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e.g., e., e., e., e., e., e., g., e., e., e., g., e., e., e., e., e., e. e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e

The plaintiff is the cause of the claim of this case. The defendant forced the plaintiff to anesthesia the surface while the plaintiff expressed his intent to refuse the operation at the time of the operation, and forced the plaintiff to conduct the operation without designing a pairum dysium, and conducted a pairal dysium dysium dysium dysium dysium dysium dysium dysium dysium dysium dysium dysium dysium and under the snow above the right side of the plaintiff's left body. The defendant asserted that the plaintiff is liable to pay consolation money to the plaintiff for physical and mental disorder dysium dysium dysium dysium dysium and right side dysium dysium, and the plaintiff suffered from physical and mental disorder dysium dysium.

The Defendant forcedly performed the instant surgery against the Plaintiff’s will on the sole basis of each of the descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Gap evidence Nos. 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, and family evidence Nos. 11 and 15.

It is not enough to recognize that the Plaintiff suffered an obstacle as alleged in the Plaintiff by conducting an incomplete or incomplete operation, and it is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff suffered an obstacle.