1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. On September 18, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) during the process of fighting fighting on the mountain trails, the Plaintiff got left hand and fluorted with a pain on the floor of the hand; and (b) on September 18, 2012, the Plaintiff was provided medical treatment by applying it to “Bneina” in the Defendant Kimhae-si, which was operated by the Defendant, to “Bneina”.

B. On October 10, 2012, the Defendant diagnosed the Plaintiff’s symptoms as “three headings of the left side,” and the Plaintiff received a medication and physical therapy from the Defendant during the period from September 18, 2012 to October 5, 2012, but the symptoms do not show. On October 10, 2012, the Defendant received a third balance of the left side resin (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

C. After the instant surgery, between October 11, 2012 and November 19, 2012, the Plaintiff complained of constant pain and fingers of the part of the instant surgery while receiving a pain treatment from the Defendant. On November 19, 2012, the Plaintiff received a written request for medical treatment from the Defendant on ten occasions between November 23, 2012 and January 23, 2013, at the Busan National University Hospital located in the Seo-gu Busan National University, Seo-gu, Busan National University, Seo-gu, Busan, for the treatment of the division of the instant surgery. On January 18, 2013, the Plaintiff received a diagnosis of “the third dives of the dives of the dives of the dives of the dives of the dives of the dives of the dives of the dives of the dives of the dives of the dives of the dives of the 3 glass.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 8, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant was negligent in violating the duty of care in the operation while performing the instant surgery against the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff left a part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the indictment, so the defendant is obliged to compensate the plaintiff for all damages caused by the negligence of the operation.

As to this, the defendant shall continue to be able to bring to the plaintiff before and after the surgery.