1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in the operation of a vehicle B New-Wood from New-Wood.

On December 4, 2014, the Defendant driving the said car as a job around 05:50 on December 4, 2014, and driving the ambo-distance intersection in the ambi-dong in Gwangju North-gu along the four-lane radius from the ambi-An intersection to the ambi- middle school north-do.

At the same time, there was a duty of care to safely drive a motor vehicle in accordance with the signals, by sufficiently examining whether there was another motor vehicle that entered the front line and the intersection to reduce the speed of the motor vehicle driver and whether there is another motor vehicle that entered the front line and the intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to proceed with a stop signal, and caused the victim C(74 years old) driver's front wheel part of the victim C(74 years old) driver's seat adjacent to the Defendant's driver's seat.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim C, such as knee knee knee fele fele fele, tension, etc., on each side of the instant business negligence, and on the victim E (V, 67 years of age) who was on the back seat of the matone fel, which requires approximately 6 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report and each medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the defendant's negligence was large in violation of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the degree of injury to the victim E is not less than that of the victim E, the defendant's depth is against the first offender, the victims and the driver's vehicle has agreed smoothly with the victims.