A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 01:40 on September 6, 2016, at around 01:0 on the same day, assaulted the police and arrested the police as a current criminal interfering with the performance of official duties and led to the ethic of the Ethm, Ma-gu Ethical Police Station Ethical F, which called “C,” in front of the main point of “C,” and called “C,” in which the Defendant 112 reported and sent a fighting, carried out a fighting, carried a fighting, pushed down three times in hand a slope F’s chest, pushed down the f’s chest, shab the f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s fat, and f’s f’s f’s f’s f’.

The death will be discarded if you entered the port.

Nic family members also sound that they will die and throw away.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statements made to F and G, and some police statements made to D;

1. A detailed statement of 112 reported and processed;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of Chapter 20 of related photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Application of the sentencing criteria [Scope of the recommended punishment] The basic area (from June to one year and four months) (no person in special sentencing) shall interfere with the performance of official duties;

2. Crimes that interfere with the execution of official duties of the police who determined the sentence of punishment are very serious in that they interfere with the desire and pride of the police and eventually bring about damage to the people.

In particular, in this case, the contents of the defendant's act are not less severe, and the defendant has already been punished by violence crimes five times.

However, it is against the defendant's wrong recognition, and there is no criminal conviction of imprisonment or more, and since 2005.