A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 8, 2018, at the permanent residence of the Defendant, the Defendant returned to the said F upon receiving the report of the said D-D 112 to the effect that the Defendant was free from a slope F belonging to the Permanent Police Station Ethal of the Permanent Police Station called up after receiving a report of the said D-D 112 to the effect that the Defendant was free from any disturbance, and that the Defendant returned to the said F.

The F returned to the said district.

However, the defendant did not have returned to the above F, but continued to enjoy the suspend level and avoid disturbance, and reported again 112, and the above F, upon receiving the above report, did not promise to talk about the lower day after returning to the Republic of Korea.

“I have heard the horses,” and “I have re-reported this Chewing year;

In today's Hague, we throw away the death of the workplace in an annual period to wurg and sing off the workplace.

“In doing so, the said F was committed with the floor of hand when putting the Defendant into the house of the said D, and the F was tightly tightly populated with the said F’s upper part.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. On-site photographs and a list of reported cases;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (report on site conditions, etc. at the time of arrest of flagrant offenders);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The basic area (from June to June) of the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended punishment] and the basic area (from June to June) (no person subject to special sentencing] shall interfere with the performance of public duties;

2. The Defendant, upon receipt of a report 112, expressed a desire to take the police officer called out and took violence.

In light of the fact that the defendant interferes with the police officer's duty to maintain order, and the attitude of the defendant's act at the time, attack, etc., the nature of the crime is not easy.

The defendant shall be subject to a suspended execution four times.