logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.12.12 2014고정2679
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 18, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor by the Seoul Northern District Court on the charge of forging official documents, etc. and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 26, 2014.

1. The Defendant conspired with the name-influor influencing person to write down as if he/she sold the goods at the Internet goods trading site, thereby obtaining money from those who belong to the said place as the price for the goods. A.

On July 26, 2013, the Defendant, even if receiving the price for the fact, did not have the intent or ability to send the goods. However, on or around July 26, 2013, the Defendant, in collusion with the false names, posted a notice on the Internet goods transaction website, stating that “the sale of the goods in question” is “the sale of the goods in question” on the Jungnak, which is the Internet goods transaction site, and deceiving the victim B who contacted with the notice to “the delivery of the goods if the payment is made,” thereby deceiving the victim B to “the delivery of the goods in advance.” The Defendant acquired 250,000 won from the

B. On July 27, 2013, the Defendant, even upon receiving the price, did not have the intent or ability to send the goods, in collusion with a name-free person, posted a notice stating that “the sales of opphone 5” at an online goods transaction site is “the sales of opphone 5” on July 27, 2013, and deceiving the victim D who contacted with the Internet goods transaction site to “the sending of opphone 5 if he/she would deposit the opphone 5,000 won”, thereby deceiving the victim as “the sending of opphone 5,000 won from the victim to the account in the name of C as the price for the goods.”

C. On July 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) did not have the intent or ability to send the goods even upon receiving the price; (b) on July 28, 2013, the Defendant, in collusion with the nominal holders, posted a notice stating that “as to deposit the price, smart TV will be sold” at the Middle Kara Paf, a website, and reported it to the victim E.

arrow