logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.05.30 2016고단1516
사기
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On October 25, 2016, the summary of the facts charged was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor and on November 2, 2016 to the Daejeon District Court for injury, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 2, 2016.

1. Around November 2014, the Defendant: (a) by telephone to the Defendant Defendant’s wife Lee Dong-dong (hereinafter “Defendant”) victim C, “A car auction site has not been carried out for three months; and (b) almost 7,000 km cars have been operated.

If the deposit is sent, it would be awarded a successful tender.

However, even if the Defendant received money from the injured party, he/she did not intend to obtain such money from the injured party, but made a false statement to the injured party, and received KRW 4.7 million from the injured party to the D corporate bank account (Account Number E) on November 3, 2014, and received KRW 4.560,000 from the injured party on November 5, 2014; KRW 1,824,000,000 as the same name around November 10, 2014; and KRW 1,63,500,000 under the same name and received KRW 29,163,50 from the injured party on November 28, 2014.

2. On November 2014, the Defendant: “Around November 2014, the Defendant is well aware of the F of the Real Estate Auction Association in Korea, and may receive the award if that person is involved.

A building exceeding 1 billion won that has been newly constructed in front of the opposite Docheon will be awarded to 600 million won by winning a contract for more than 1 billion won. In this regard, 46 million won as a bid bond was sent.

However, even if the Defendant did not intend to receive money as a bid bond from the injured party even if he received money as a bid bond, the Defendant made a false statement to the injured party as above, and received 46 million won from the injured party to the account under the name of paragraph (1) D of the above Article around December 2 of the same year.

Around that time, the Defendant again tried to see another one because he did not receive a successful bid. The Defendant sent a new bid bond 50 million won since time to find a bid bond.

D. of December 9 of the same year from the person who suffered damage by making a false statement.

arrow