A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who manufactures plastic resin with the trade name of “D” and the victim E is a person who manufactures plastic resin in the trade name of “F.”

1. Embezzlement;

A. On November 2012, the Defendant received a request from the injured party for processing the TPP raw materials, and embezzled the TPPM products at the place of business located in Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si, on November 15, 2012, upon delivery of 5,300 km raw materials, and around January 15, 2013, after receiving delivery of 15,810 g of the TPP raw materials at the same place, and completed processing during storage, at the same time and at the same time (ju).

B. From January 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) requested by the injured party of the PP to purchase the powder of plastic raw materials to request for the purchase of the powder of the PP; (b) transferred the purchase price of KRW 17 million to the victim (ju) who sold the end of the PP; and (c) from January 28, 2014, the Defendant transferred the purchase price of KRW 17 million to the victim (ju).

2.5. Around April 21, 2014: (a) received delivery of PP end 47,980km from H; and (b) returned 25,000 g of the storage in D’s workplace to the victim; and (c) embezzled the remainder 22,980 g of the storage in D’s workplace by refusing the request for return from the injured party on April 21, 2014 without justifiable grounds.

2. On December 2013, the Defendant would receive a successful bid by participating in the PP powder tender, which is the end of plastic raw materials sold by the SK comprehensive chemical, from the F office located in Yangsan-si I, where “D is registered as a collaborative company of the SK General Chemical.” If the bid bond is a week, the Defendant would receive a successful bid.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if you receive money from the injured party as a bid bond, the intent was to use the above money for the defendant's personal repayment of the obligation, and there was no intention to win the PP portion by participating in the bidding.

On December 13, 2013, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was transferred KRW 15 million as bid deposit from the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number:J) in the name of the Defendant on December 13, 2013.

(i) the evidence;