Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of six months.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. The sole crime committed by Defendant A;

A. The Defendant is a staff member of the Security Business Chain Co., Ltd.

Although there is no bid bond system for the supply of clothes, the Defendant was willing to acquire money by deceiving the money by deceiving the use of the money without true reporting to the victim F.

On December 29, 2008, the Defendant would arrange to supply clothes to the victims of G apartment G 104-101 at Dongducheon-si around December 29, 2008 so that the Defendant may supply the clothes to the head of the Suwon, Inc., Ltd., which is going on the face of KRW 12 million.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received money of KRW 12 million from the victim to the national bank account of the Defendant (number H) under the same day as the bid bond for the same day.

B. On March 12, 2009, the Defendant would arrange for the Defendant to supply the Defendant’s service uniform to the employees, such as booms, to the lower court, in light of the bid bond, etc., to the lower court’s order on March 12, 2009.

“A false statement” was made.

In fact, even if the Defendant received money from the injured party, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to arrange for the supply of employee uniforms to the semiconductors of the company.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim, received 25 million won from the victim to the Defendant’s national bank account on the same day from the victim, and took over 15 times until November 2, 2009, a total of KRW 139,820,00, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

2. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants

A. Defendant A was urged by F to return money due to the forgery of private documents and the use of the said investigation documents, which was not supplied as a work uniform to the Hashes semiconductor Co., Ltd.

Defendant

A prepares a false document that orders the delivery of work clothes to Defendant B, even though he did not place an order for the delivery of work clothes in an undisclosed semiconductor corporation.