logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.04.24 2013고단83
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 16:00 on September 3, 2012, the Defendant discovered a mixed victim (the 17-year old and female) who was seated in an emergency stairs, and accessed him, and proposed the victim to sell her sex by suggesting cash that “it is unnecessary for a person to leave her home and her home are. There is a toilet or park in the past,” and allowing the victim to pay a certain amount of money to her horse if she wanted to her horse, she was defective in her farcing, leading the victim to her arm’s length, and leading the victim to her arm’s length, as stated in the victim’s arm’s length, whether she has a male-gu and her permanent address, several times, whether she is well-known, and whether she is well-known with her will.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Article 10 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and the Selection of Fines concerning the relevant criminal facts;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

4. Where the conviction of the accused against the crime of a sex offense against a child or juvenile who has registered personal information under Article 13 of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse is finalized, the accused is a person subject to registration of personal information pursuant to Article 33(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, and the accused is obligated to submit personal information to the competent agency pursuant to Article 34

However, the disclosure order of registered information needs to be prudent in that it may have a serious impact on the rehabilitation of the defendant, and in this case, it seems that the registration of personal information alone can have an effect to prevent recidivism of the defendant. Thus, the disclosure order of registered information does not order the defendant to disclose or notify the registered information.

arrow