logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.07.03 2012고정2304
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 24, 2011, Defendant A issued KRW 100,00 to F (n, 15 years of age) who became aware of through the Internet-raising site at the cross-American conference located in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and had sexual intercourse once to purchase the sex of juveniles.

2. Around October 26, 2011, Defendant B issued KRW 100,00 to F (n, 15 years of age) who became aware of through the Internet holding site at the cross-American conference located in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and had sexual intercourse once to purchase the sex of juveniles.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ partial statements in the first trial record;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Results of inspection by this court;

1. Details of currency;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of photograph (investigative record, 742 pages);

1. Article 10(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (amended by Act No. 11572, Dec. 18, 2012);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 21 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse:

1. Where this judgment becomes final and conclusive under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendants are obligated to submit personal information to the head of the competent police office in accordance with Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and Article 2 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and Article 43 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes.

However, the disclosure order of registered information needs to be prudent in that it may have a serious impact on the Defendants’ rehabilitation into the society. In this case, the personal information registration alone appears to have an effect to prevent the Defendants from repeating the crime. Therefore, the disclosure order of registered information does not order the Defendants to disclose and notify the registered information.

Defendant

A.

arrow