logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2010. 03. 26. 선고 2009누19634 판결
부부간의 부동산 거래를 증여로 본 처분의 당부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2008Guhap48695 ( October 15, 2009)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2008west0845 ( October 02, 2008)

Title

Appropriateness of the main disposition by donation of real estate transactions between husband and wife

Summary

Property transferred to a spouse shall be presumed to have been donated by his spouse, etc. at the time when the transferor transfers the property.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant shall revoke the disposition of imposition of gift tax of KRW 97,152,304 against the plaintiff on December 14, 2007.

Reasons

The reasoning for this Court's explanation is that "B" of No. 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance is 'B' (which seems to have leased its name to PCC) and 'PD' following 'PD' of No. 6. 3. 'P. 9' and 'P. 28, 'P. 2006. 28.', 'P. 3. 10% shares and 20% shares of No. 3. 10 to 11', 'P. 40% shares and 60% shares to the plaintiff', 'P. 40% shares and 60% shares to the 4. 'P. 6. 'P. 'P. 'P. 1' and 8. 'P. 'P. 1' testimony of P. 'P. 'I. 'I. 2' witness testimony of the 4. 'P. ' by the court of first instance'.

arrow