logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.06.30 2015가단215714
손해배상(자)
Text

1. As to Plaintiff A’s KRW 178,366,747, and KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff B, and each of the said money from May 15, 2014 to May 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is an insurer that entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract for the amount of DNA car owned by Nonparty C (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

B. At around 20:40 on May 15, 2014, C driven the instant vehicle and stopped one lane in front of the Frijudo road located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, while reporting red signal. While the point where the Defendant’s vehicle stopped is less than the permissible point for U-turn, C was placed with a yellow central line, but C, while driving a U-turn as it was at that place, was shocked on the front of the instant vehicle, the Plaintiff A, who was crossinged the said road on board the bicycle in the opposite direction, and thereby, Plaintiff A suffered injury, such as the blood cerebral brain, etc., of the instant vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

Plaintiff

A hospitalized at the KaTol University Daejeon Hospital, Chungcheongnamnam University Hospital, etc. after the instant accident, on May 16, 2014, 2014, the crypology therapy and the dypology removal surgery on May 22, 2014, the crypology surgery on July 2, 2014, and crypology surgery on July 31, 2014. On January 11, 2016, the 76% labor disability rate (the cypology assessment table, brain items, third-C items, and the cypology of outdoor workers) was reduced to the extent that the crypology was applied to the remaining 3rd workers.

Plaintiff

B is the children of Plaintiff A.

[Reasons for Recognition] The absence of dispute, Gap's statements in Gap's 1 through 3, 7 through 9, the result of the commission of physical examination to the director of the Ansan Hospital at Korea University at Korea, significant facts, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts, the accident in this case occurred due to the negligence of the duty of care, even though C had to live well before, after, after, after and after the accident in this case, C had to work for a safe internship at the permitted point of U.S., which is the insurer of the vehicle in this case.

arrow