logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.02.10 2016고단4031
부정수표단속법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The facts charged [2016 Highest 4031] The Defendant entered into a household check contract with a branch of the national bank and the Defendant from October 24, 2006, and traded household checks.

On June 20, 2016, the Defendant issued one copy of a national bank bank check in the name of the Defendant, which became “D”, “five million won per face value”, and date of issuance “ October 20, 2016,” through employees, at the C Office located in Kimhae-si B on June 20, 2016, and presented a payment on or around October 20, 2016 during the period for which the check was presented by the holder, but did not receive payment as a transaction, from that time, the Defendant issued a check three times in total as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form, and did not receive payment within the period for which the check was presented.

[2016 Highest 4382] From October 24, 2006, the Defendant entered into a household check contract with a third party branch of the National Bank in the name of the Defendant and traded household checks.

1. On July 27, 2016, the Defendant issued a copy of a national bank bank check in the Defendant’s name, which was named as “E”, “five million won per face value”, “date of issuance”, and “ October 27, 2016,” and presented a payment as of October 27, 2016 during the period for which the check was presented by the holder, but did not receive payment as suspension of transaction.

2. On August 17, 2016, the Defendant issued one copy of a national bank bank check in the name of the Defendant, which was named as “F”, “five million won” at a check number, “five million won”, and the date of issuance “ November 17, 2016,” and presented a payment on November 27, 2016 during the period for which the check was presented by the holder, but did not receive payment as suspension of transaction.

2. Determination

(a) Article 2(4) of the Illegal Number of Vote Control Act;

B. Full recovery of the check after the prosecution of this case

C. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)

arrow