A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 14:10 on May 8, 2016, the Defendant reported to 112 at the top of the Mar. 14:10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) sent a string of Mat in front of Mat, a Mat, and 112 on his face; and (b) asked the police officer affiliated with the Mabnyang Police Station D, who was called upon upon receipt of a report, how he wants to assist in the case; and (c) asked the above E, “I must do so” to “I must do so”; (d) the above E, “I must do so only,” and (e) continued to stop to stop, “I must do so” and “I must do so,” and (e) the above E, was arrested as a flagrant offender, but was notified that I could continue to engage in the same conduct.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties on the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (limited to the poor quality of the crime, but considering the beginning of the crime, reflectivity, etc.);