logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.11.28 2014고단4056
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 14, 2014, at around 00:05, the Defendant reported that “The Maarnar shall have the phone at the 112 situation room in the Jeonsung-gun Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency’s 112 situation room, and “the Defendant shall not have the phone.” There is no yet a phone call. There is no yet a call yet to be available. C apartment 1501, the Defendant reported that “The Manar shall not be reported as soon as possible, and whether the Manar shall not be reported as soon as possible, whether the Madar, Madar, Madar, and Madar, 1501,” c apartment 1501.

At around 00:12 of the same day, the Defendant asked questions as to whether he would be a person in charge of the police box, which was dispatched after receiving the above report, to the above E, and expressed, without any justifiable reason, the Defendant expressed to the above E the desire to be “satise,” and expressed to the assistant F of the same affiliated assistant F, who reported the above situation, “the satise reported” at the Defendant’s hand.

The Defendant, who continuously prevented the above F from committing an act one time, was arrested as a flagrant offender, and even when he was arrested as a flagrant offender, expressed the above F’s bath that “I am am at the end of the new cover.” The Defendant again took the bath that “I am am am at the end of the new cover. I am at low am am gules, and am am at the end of the F’s left hand.”

Since then, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender and was accompanied by a police box to the police box, and was brought to the police box inside the patrol boat while entering the police box, and received the above F’s left side.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted F, a police officer, to interfere with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, and investigation of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

arrow