logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.09.25 2019나52461
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this case by the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition or modification as to “the addition or modification of 2. Additional” as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. To delete “as joint and several,” two pages 2 of the addition or modification.

2. On the 12th page, “the total amount of KRW 180,000,000” shall be read as “each nine million,” respectively.

3. On the other hand, “The presumption is presumed (Article 47(2) and (3) of the Commercial Act)” is added as follows: “In order to reverse the presumption, the person who asserts the opposing fact is liable to prove it (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da54378, Dec. 11, 2008).”

3. The 7th page " provided" was provided.

It is found that he did not submit his trade books or trade books.

3. In conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants should be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in its conclusion. Thus, all appeals filed against the Defendants by the Plaintiff are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow