The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the representative of the redevelopment and improvement project association B’s housing redevelopment and improvement project association.

No one shall distribute information with a content that defames another person by divulging a fact, false fact, openly and purposely to defame a person in an information and communications network.

그럼에도 피고인은 2019. 3. 16. 장소불상지에서 정보통신망인 C에 개설한 B 주택재개발 정비사업 조합원 C상에 조합원 피해자 D에 대해서 "조합장이 되보려고 조합장한테 청탁했다. C 리더권을 넘겨주면 조합장이 될 것이고 그 대가로 수십억을 조합장한테 지급하겠다. 수십억을 제안하는 대화 내용을 녹음해 뒀으니 필요시 조합원한테 공개할 수도 있다. 고소인의 수십억 청탁에 조합장이 거부했다. 고소인이 조합 돈 수십억을 도둑질하려 했다."라는 내용으로 허위사실의 글을 게시하였다.

Accordingly, through the information and communication network of the defendant, the victim's reputation was damaged by pointing false facts by pointing false facts for the purpose of slandering the victim.

2. The facts charged in the instant case can not be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 70(3) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., as a crime falling under Article 70(2) of the same Act.

However, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, since it is apparent in the record that the victim expressed his wish not to punish the defendant after the institution of the prosecution of this case.