logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014. 04. 30. 선고 2014두2041 판결
(심리불속행) 원고가 쟁점부동산의 실질 양도자이며 미등기전매를 한 사실이 인정됨[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court 2013Nu947 ( December 26, 2013)

Title

(Incompetence of Trial) The plaintiff is the actual transferor of the real property at issue and the fact that the plaintiff had sold the unregistered real property before sale is recognized.

Summary

(Main) The transferor of the instant real estate is determined as the Plaintiff, and the additional documentary evidence submitted by the Plaintiff is difficult to trust as evidence in consideration of the writing and the form of stamp image, etc.

Cases

2014Du2041 Revocation of taxation disposition

Plaintiff-Appellant

Park AA

Defendant-Appellee

The director of the tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon High Court Decision 2013Nu947 decided December 26, 2013

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

arrow