1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

In collusion, the Defendants: (a) at the marina business place in the name of “F” located on the E and 2nd floor in Asia-si from Apr. 2, 2016 to Nov. 22, 2016, the Defendants: (b) installed two rooms with simple intrusion in the space of 60 equity; and (c) installed three rooms with shower facilities; (d) employed female employees of sexual traffic; (e) hired female employees G, etc. who find the said business place, and (e) arranged sexual traffic by having female employees and sexual agents, who were waiting in the atmosphere in the atmosphere, receive more than 110,00 won per hour from male customers who find the said business place, and instruct them to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The legal statement of the witness G and witness A in part;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects by the prosecution against the Defendants

1. Defendant B asserts that he is an employee employed by Defendant A, and that he is merely an aiding and abetting crime of this case and does not constitute a joint principal offender.

However, in light of the fact that Defendant B directly employs Defendant B, a female employee engaged in sexual traffic at the marina business place of the above “F” (hereinafter “the instant sexual traffic business place”), Defendant B, from the total profits of the instant sexual traffic business place, carried out most of the settlement affairs of the instant sexual traffic business place, such as monthly rent, public charges, G, and monthly wage, and delivering the profits remaining after deducting the monthly wage from the monthly rent, public charges, and monthly wage to Defendant A. Defendant B, while Defendant B, who was stationed in the instant sexual traffic business place, was in charge of the instant sexual traffic business place, so that Defendant B and the said G are allowed to carry out sexual traffic, while Defendant B visited the said business place only once a week, Defendant B could fully recognize the joint processing intention and functional control over the instant crime, and thus, Defendant B is also deemed joint principal offenders. Accordingly, Defendant B does not accept the said assertion).

Application of Statutes

1. Article 19 (2) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense.