logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 02. 23. 선고 2016두60119 판결
저가양수에서 양수자가 그 거래상대방의 사용인 등에 해당하더라도 거래상대방을 ‘특수관계에 있는 자’에 해당한다고 볼 수는 없음[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu71848 ( October 06, 2016)

Title

Even if the transferee falls under an employee of the other party to the transaction in a low-price acquisition, it cannot be viewed as an "person having a special relationship with the other party".

Summary

Inasmuch as a transferor or transferee at a high-priced transfer falls under an employee of the other party to the transaction, etc., it cannot be deemed that the other party to the transaction constitutes an employee of the other party to the transaction, etc. under the above provision (see Supreme Court Decision 2011Du11990, Sept. 12, 2013, etc.).

Related statutes

Article 35 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Cases

2016Du6019 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff-Appellee

Park AA

Defendant-Appellant

O Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court 2015Nu71848 ( October 06, 2016)

Imposition of Judgment

February 23, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant is clear that it falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per

arrow