logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2014.02.13 2013고단901
업무상과실치사
Text

Defendant

A and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 7,000,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who is engaged in 2B/L 4 Section sewage culverts and drainage facilities construction works in the vicinity of the Election Commission in Incheon City, and Defendant B is a person in charge of safety management at the construction site of the above construction site, and Defendant C is a corporation established for construction business, etc.

1. On April 22, 2013, Defendant A and Defendant B were engaged in the work of dump trucking the ground by adjusting the above excavation season at the direction of Defendant B at the construction site at the above construction site and moving the soil remaining on the floor to a dump truck using dump diskettess.

Defendant

B In order to prevent danger to workers, B has a duty of care to conduct a work by preparing a work plan including preventive measures, operational routes, working methods, etc. in order to conduct a prior investigation into the relevant work, topography, etc. in the relevant work site, and to prevent any danger to a rapid landing, etc. according to the relevant work, and notify the relevant worker of the contents of the work plan, and by taking necessary measures, such as posting signal numbers within the radius of the excavated season to block people's access and informing people of the access, and by taking necessary measures, to prevent danger caused by the operation of the excavating season. Defendant A had a duty of care to conduct the work in a safe manner, such as operating the digging season, etc., after checking whether there is any person who is engaged in the adjustment of the digging season and who has been engaged in the adjustment work of the digging season, and to safely

Nevertheless, the Defendants neglected to do so, and Defendant B did not take necessary measures such as informing the relevant workers of the contents of the relevant work plan in advance or posting signal numbers within the radius of the search and seizure work and ordered Defendant A to perform the search and seizure work, and Defendant A did not check whether there is any person who works before and after the search and seizure work.

arrow