Defendant

A, B, and C Co., Ltd. shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,00, and KRW 2,000,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and B’s occupational occupational death, Defendant B’s violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act entered into a contract with C Co., Ltd. for the lease and work of digging machines, and Defendant B is a G digging machine driver who performed the work laid underground as a F. Defendant B is a field manager who manages and supervises the overall field of work, such as safety and health management of employees belonging to the site of “H installation work” performed by C Co., Ltd. under a contract with Korea Electric Power Corporation. The victim I(66) is a daily employee of C Co.

Defendant

A around September 10, 2018, around 08:30 on September 10, 2018, at the site of the installation of F Distribution Line in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan Government, it was engaged in the construction of conduits by using a cutter.

In such cases, Defendant A, engaged in the operation of the excavation season, has a duty of care to take safety measures, such as examining whether there is a person in the radius of the excavation season in order to prevent accidents caused by the excavation season work, and in particular, he/she has a duty of care to receive a traffic signal manual, and Defendant B, who is in charge of the management of safety and health affairs, has a duty of care to take safety measures, such as preparing a work plan when he/she conducts work by using the excavation searcher, which is a vehicle type of construction machinery, and notifying the relevant worker of the details of the work and work plan in accordance with the plan, and not allowing workers to enter a place where there is a risk that workers may face due to contact with the relevant vehicle type of construction machinery in operation, and allowing workers to access by allocating

Nevertheless, the Defendants did not discover a victim who had been transported to a sculpt in the course of the operation of the sculpt by negligence while neglecting the above duty of care, and did not discover the victim who had been transferred to a sculpt in the course of the operation of the sculpt, and the right side of the sculpt after the sculing of the victim, leading the victim to the death of the sculpted long-term damage by the chest and the