logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2013.10.01 2013고단166
업무상과실치사등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who has worked as a field technician at the construction site of E pharmacy in Namwon-si, Namwon-si, and Defendant B is a field director at the above site and a person who is appointed as a person in charge of safety management.

1. At around 16:40 on May 7, 2013, Defendant A, while driving a F digging pool at the above construction site without a construction machinery driver’s license, the Defendant neglected his duty of care to check whether there is any person to see whether there is any person to see the right and the right and the right at the above construction site, and caused the Victim G’s body in the course of melting the cryp to the front side of the cryp in the above cryp season by neglecting his duty of care to check whether or not there is any person to see whether or not there is any person to cryping the cryp.

2. In conducting work by using Defendant B digging machines, a work plan concerning safety measures, including operating routes and working methods, shall be formulated in order to prevent risks, such as fall, fallen, electric failure, narrowness, collapse, etc. according to the work, and an operation plan shall be carried out in accordance with the work plan; and when conducting work by using a digging range, no worker shall be allowed to enter any place in contact with the driver and likely to pose risks to workers, unless the worker is placed to induce the digging range;

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not prepare a work plan for safety measures, including operational routes and work methods, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, and did not assign an guide, and had the above Gap drive the above sofaculer to destroy the ground, and did not prevent the above G employed by the Defendant Company from entering the construction site where the digging season is in operation, as in the preceding paragraph.

arrow