The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes, considering the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s history of fine punishment for the same kind of crime is nine times; (b) the amount of fraud is not significant; and (c) the quality of the crime is not good by fraud with employment; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime; and (b) the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, background, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., the Defendant’s argument cannot be deemed unfair because the Defendant’s punishment is too excessive. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.